A very nice post explaining the evolution (and the dead end) of modern scientific publishing.
I mentioned earlier that I was in Oxford yesterday — mostly to participate in the debate at the Oxford Union, “Evolution or Revolution in Science Communication?” I was on the revolution side, with Jason Hoyt (PeerJ), Amelia Andersdotter (Swedish Pirate Party MEP) and Paul Wicks (Patientslikeme). The “evolution” side was represented by David Tempest (Elsevier), Graham Taylor (ex Publishers’ Association), Jason Wilde (Nature) and — rather surprisingly — Cameron Neylon (PLOS).
Here is my opening statement:
Evolution or Revolution In Science Communication
Mike Taylor, University of Bristol
“Rigour and Openness in 21st Century Science” conference
Oxford, Thursday 11 April 2013.
In my academic life, I study the evolution of dinosaurs. I know a bit about evolution, and before I give my position in this evolution-or-revolution debate, I’d like to dispel a few evolutionary myths.
First, the Victorians liked to talk about the scalanaturae, the great chain of…
View original post 667 more words